Mercurial > pub > bltoolkit
view Tools/DocGen/Content/Doc/DataAccess/Introduction.htm @ 2:79a04c6442bf
file name case fix
author | cin |
---|---|
date | Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:41:57 +0400 |
parents | f990fcb411a9 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
<% title # Introduction to abstract data accessors %> <% order # 1 %> <h4>Introduction</h4> <p class='j'> Before we start talking about the data accessors, let us create a few examples of typical data accessor methods. </p> <p class='j'> The following table contains three stored procedures and three data access methods implementing the stored procedure calls. </p> <table width='100%'> <tr><th>Stored procedure</th><th>Data access method</th></tr> <tr><td colspan=2 style='padding-top:7px'> The first stored procedure takes filter and page parameters and returns recordset from the Person table. </td></tr> <tr> <td width=50% height=100%><% sql # CREATE Procedure GetPersonListByName( @firstName varchar(50), @lastName varchar(50), @pageNumber int, @pageSize int) AS -- stored procedure implementation -- %></td> <td width=50%><% cs # public List<Person> GetPersonListByName( string firstName, string lastName, int pageNumber, int pageSize) { // method implementation. } %></td> </tr> <tr><td colspan=2> Second example will return single <b>Person</b> record by <b>id</b>. </td></tr> <tr> <td width=50% height=100%><% sql # CREATE Procedure GetPersonByID(@id int) AS -- stored procedure implementation -- %> </td> <td width=50%><% cs # public Person GetPersonByID(int id) { // method implementation. } %></td> </tr> <tr><td colspan=2> The last example will delete a record from the database by <b>id</b>. </td></tr> <tr> <td width=50% height=100%><% sql # CREATE Procedure DeletePersonByID(@id int) AS -- stored procedure implementation -- %></td> <td width=50%><% cs # public void DeletePersonByID(int id) { // method implementation. } %></td> </tr> </table> <p class='j'>Now lets see what we can say if we compare the stored procedure and C# method signatures. <ol> <li>Stored procedure and method names match up.</li> <li>Sequential order, method parameter types and names correspond to stored procedure parameters.</li> <li>Methods' return values can give us an idea what <b>Execute</b> method we should utilize and what object type has to be used to map data from recordset if needed.</li> </ol> </p> <p class='j'> As demonstrated above method definition contains all the information we need to implement the method body. Actually, by defining the method signatures, we completed the most intelligent part of data accessor development. The rest of work is definitely a monkey's job. Honestly, I got bored of being just a coding machine writing the same data access code over and over again, especially understanding that this process can be automated. </p> <p class='j'> This introduction shows how to avoid the implementation step of data access development and how to reduce this routine process to the method declaration. </p> <h4>Abstract classes</h4> <p class='j'> Unfortunately, mainstream .NET languages still do not have a compile-time transformation system like some functional or <a href="http://nemerle.org/Macros">hybrid</a> languages do. All we have today is pre-compile- and run-time code generation. </p> <p class='j'> This introduction concentrates on run-time code generation and its support by <a href="http://www.bltoolkit.net/">Business Logic Toolkit for .NET</a>. </p> <p class='j'> Let us step back and bring the methods from the previous examples together in one class. Ideally, this data accessor class could look like the following: </p> <% cs # using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public class PersonAccessor { public List<Person> GetPersonListByName( string firstName, string lastName, int pageNumber, int pageSize); public Person GetPersonByID (int id); public void DeletePersonByID(int id); } %> <p class='j'> The bad news about this sample is that we cannot use such syntax as the compiler expects the method's body implementation. </p> <p class='j'> The good news is we can use abstract classes and methods that give us quite similar, compilable source code. </p> <% cs # using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public /*[a]*/abstract/*[/a]*/ class PersonAccessor { public /*[a]*/abstract/*[/a]*/ List<Person> GetPersonListByName( string firstName, string lastName, int pageNumber, int pageSize); public /*[a]*/abstract/*[/a]*/ Person GetPersonByID (int id); public /*[a]*/abstract/*[/a]*/ void DeletePersonByID(int id); } %> <p class='j'>This code is 100% valid and our next step is to make it workable.</p> <H4>Abstract DataAccessor</H4> <p class='j'> Business Logic Toolkit provides the <b>DataAccessor</b> class, which is used as a base class to develop data accessor classes. If we add <b>DataAccessor</b> to our previous example, it will look like the following: </p> <% cs # using System; using System.Collections.Generic; public abstract class PersonAccessor : /*[a]*/DataAccessor/*[/a]*/ { public abstract List<Person> GetPersonListByName( string firstName, string lastName, int pageNumber, int pageSize); public abstract Person GetPersonByID (int id); public abstract void DeletePersonByID(int id); } %> <p class='j'>That's it! Now this class is complete and fully functional. The code below shows how to use it:</p> <% cs # using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using BLToolkit.Reflection; namespace DataAccess { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { PersonAccessor pa = /*[a]*/TypeAccessor/*[/a]*/<PersonAccessor>./*[a]*/CreateInstance/*[/a]*/(); List<Person> list = pa.GetPersonListByName("Crazy", "Frog", 0, 20); foreach (Person p in list) Console.Write("{0} {1}", p.FirstName, p.LastName); } } } %> <p class='j'> The only magic here is the <b>TypeAccessor.CreateInstance</b> method. First of all this method creates a new class inherited from the <b>PersonAccessor</b> class and then generates abstract method bodies depending on each method declaration. If we wrote those methods manually, we could get something like the following: </p> <% cs # using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using BLToolkit.Data; namespace Example.BLToolkitExtension { public sealed class PersonAccessor : Example.PersonAccessor { public override List<Person> GetPersonListByName( string firstName, string lastName, int pageNumber, int pageSize) { using (DbManager db = GetDbManager()) { return db .SetSpCommand("GetPersonListByName", db.Parameter("@firstName", firstName), db.Parameter("@lastName", lastName), db.Parameter("@pageNumber", pageNumber), db.Parameter("@pageSize", pageSize)) .ExecuteList<Person>(); } } public override Person GetPersonByID(int id) { using (DbManager db = GetDbManager()) { return db .SetSpCommand("GetPersonByID", db.Parameter("@id", id)) .ExecuteObject<Person>(); } } public override void DeletePersonByID(int id) { using (DbManager db = GetDbManager()) { db .SetSpCommand("DeletePersonByID", db.Parameter("@id", id)) .ExecuteNonQuery(); } } } } %> <p class='j'> (The <a href='..\Data\index.htm'>DbManager</a> class is another BLToolkit class used for 'low-level' database access). </p> <p class="j"> Every part of the method declaration is important. Method's return value specifies one of the Execute methods in the following way: <table class='data'> <tr><th>Return Type</th><th>Execute Method</th></tr> <tr><td><i>IDataReader</i> interface</td><td>ExecuteReader</td></tr> <tr><td>Subclass of <i>DataSet</i></td><td>ExecuteDataSet</td></tr> <tr><td>Subclass of <i>DataTable</i></td><td>ExecuteDataTable</td></tr> <tr><td>Class implementing the <i>IList</i> interface</td><td><a href="ExecuteList.htm">ExecuteList</a> or <a href="ExecuteList.htm">ExecuteScalarList</a></td></tr> <tr><td>Class implementing the <i>IDictionary</i> interface</td><td><a href="ExecuteDictionary.htm">ExecuteDictionary</a> or <a href="ExecuteDictionary.htm">ExecuteScalarDictionary</a></td></tr> <tr><td><i>void</i></td><td>ExecuteNonQuery</td></tr> <tr><td><i>string</i>, <i>byte[]</i> or value type</td><td><a href="ExecuteScalar.htm">ExecuteScalar</a></td></tr> <tr><td>In any other case</td><td><a href="ExecuteObject.htm">ExecuteObject</a></td></tr> </table> The method name explicitly defines the action name, which is converted to the stored procedure name. Type, sequential order, and name of the method parameters are mapped to the command parameters. Exceptions from this rule are: <br> <div style='margin:-10px 0px -0px -10px'><ul compact="compact"> <li>a parameter of <a href="../Data/index.htm"><i>DbManager</i></a> type. In this case generator uses provided <a href="../Data/index.htm"><i>DbManager</i></a> to call the command.</li> <li>parameters decorated with attribute <a href='#FormatAttribute'>FormatAttribute</a>, <a href='#DestinationAttribute'>DestinationAttribute</a>.</li> </ul></div> </p> <h4>Generating process control</h4> <p class='j'> The <b>PersonAccessor</b> class above is a very simple example and, of course, it seems too ideal to be real. In real life, we need more flexibility and more control over the generated code. BLToolkit contains a bunch of attributes to control DataAccessor generation in addition to <b>DataAccessor</b> virtual members. </p> <h5>Method CreateDbManager</h5> <% cs # protected virtual DbManager CreateDbManager() { return new DbManager(); } %> <p class='j'> By default, this method creates a new instance of <b>DbManager</b> that uses default database configuration. You can change this behavior by overriding this method. For example: </p> <% cs # public abstract class OracleDataAccessor : DataAccessor { protected override DbManager CreateDbManager() { return new DbManager("Oracle", "Production"); } } %> <p class='j'> This code will use the <i>Oracle</i> data provider and <i>Production</i> configuration. </p> <a name='GetDefaultSpName'></a><h5>Method GetDefaultSpName</h5> <% cs # protected virtual string GetDefaultSpName(string typeName, string actionName) { return typeName == null? actionName: string.Format("{0}_{1}", typeName, actionName); } %> <p class='j'> As I mentioned, the method name explicitly defines the so-called action name. The final stored procedure name is created by the <b>GetDefaultSpName</b> method. The default implementation uses the following naming convention: </p> <ul> <li> If type name is provided, the method constructs the stored proc name by concatenating the type and action names. Thus, if the type name is "Person" and the action name is "GetAll", the resulting sproc name will be "Person_GetAll". </li> <li> If the type name is NOT provided, the stored procedure name will equal the action name.</li> </ul> <p class='j'> You can easily change this behavior. For example, for the naming convention "p_Person_GetAll", the method implementation can be the following: </p> <% cs # public abstract class MyBaseDataAccessor<T,A> : DataAccessor<T,A> where A : DataAccessor<T,A> { protected override string GetDefaultSpName(string typeName, string actionName) { return string.Format("p_{0}_{1}", typeName, actionName); } } %> <h5>Method GetTableName</h5> <% cs # protected virtual string GetTableName(Type type) { // ... return type.Name; } %> <p class='j'> By default, the table name is the associated object type name (<i>Person</i> in our examples). There are two ways to associate an object type with an accessor. By providing generic parameter: </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person> { } %> <p class='j'> And by the <b>ObjectType</b> attribute: </p> <% cs # [ObjectType(typeof(Person))] public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor { } %> <p class='j'> If you want to have different table and type names in your application, you may override the <b>GetTableName</b> method: </p> <% cs # public abstract class OracleDataAccessor<T,A> : DataAccessor<T,A> where A : DataAccessor<T,A> { protected override string GetTableName(Type type) { return base.GetTableName(type).ToUpper(); } } %> <h5>TableNameAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> Also, you can change the table name for a particular object type by decorating this object with the <b>TableNameAttribute</b> attribute: </p> <% cs # [TableName("PERSON")] public class Person { public int ID; public string FirstName; public string LastName; } %> <h5>ActionNameAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> This attribute allows changing the action name. </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { [ActionName("GetByID")] protected abstract IDataReader GetByIDInternal(DbManager db, int id); public Person GetByID(int id) { using (DbManager db = GetDbManager()) using (IDataReader rd = GetByIDInternal(db, id)) { Person p = new Person(); // do something complicated. return p; } } } %> <h5>ActionSprocNameAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> This attribute associates the action name with a stored procedure name: </p> <% cs# [ActionSprocName("Insert", Ýsp_Person_Insert")] public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { public abstract void Insert(Person p); } %> <p class='j'> This attribute can be useful when you need to reassign a stored procedure name for a method defined in your base class. </p> <h5>SprocNameAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> The regular way to assign deferent from default sproc name for a method is the <b>SprocName</b> attribute. </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { [SprocName("sp_Person_Insert")] public abstract void Insert(Person p); } %> <a name='DestinationAttribute'></a><h5>DestinationAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> By default, the DataAccessor generator uses method's return value to determine which <i>Execute</i> method should be used to perform the current operation. The <b>DestinationAttribute</b> indicates that target object is a parameter decorated with this attribute: </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { public abstract void GetAll([Destination] List<Person> list); } %> <h5>DirectionAttributes</h5> <p class='j'> <i>DataAccessor</i> generator can map provided business object to stored procedure parameters. <b>Direction</b> attributes allow controlling this process more precisely. </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { public abstract void Insert( [Direction.Output("ID"), Direction.Ignore("LastName")] Person person); } %> <p class='j'> In addition, BLToolkit provides two more direction attributes: <b>Direction.InputOutputAttribute</b> and <b>Direction.ReturnValueAttribute</b>. </p> <h5>DiscoverParametersAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> By default, BLToolkit expects method parameter names to match stored procedure parameter names. The sequential order of parameters is not important in this case. This attribute enforces BLToolkit to retrieve parameter information from the sproc and to assign method parameters in the order they go. Parameter names are ignored. </p> <a name='FormatAttribute'></a><h5>FormatAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> This attribute indicates that the specified parameter is used to construct the stored procedure name or SQL statement: </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { [SqlQuery("SELECT {0} FROM {1} WHERE {2}")] public abstract List<string> GetStrings( [Format(0)] string fieldName, [Format(1)] string tableName, [Format(2)] string whereClause); } %> <h5>IndexAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> If you want your method to return a dictionary, you will have to specify fields to build the dictionary key. The Index attribute allows you to do that: </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { [SqlQuery("SELECT * FROM Person")] [Index("ID")] public abstract Dictionary<int, Person> SelectAll1(); [SqlQuery("SELECT * FROM Person")] [Index("@PersonID", "LastName")] public abstract Dictionary<CompoundValue, Person> SelectAll2(); } %> <p class='j'>Note: if your key has more than one field, the type of this key should be <b>CompoundValue</b>.</p> <p class='j'>If the field name starts from '@' symbol, BLToolkit reads the field value from data source, otherwise from an object property/field.</p> <h5>ParamNameAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> By default, the method parameter name should match the stored procedure parameter name. This attribute specifies the sproc parameter name explicitly. </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { public abstract Person SelectByName( [ParamName("FirstName")] string name1, [ParamName("@LastName")] string name2); } %> <h5>ScalarFieldNameAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> If your method returns a dictionary of scalar values, you will have to specify the name or index of the field used to populate the scalar list. The <b>ScalarFieldName</b> attribute allows you to do that: </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { [SqlQuery("SELECT * FROM Person")] [Index("@PersonID")] [ScalarFieldName("FirstName")] public abstract Dictionary<int, string> SelectAll1(); [SqlQuery("SELECT * FROM Person")] [Index("PersonID", "LastName")] [ScalarFieldName("FirstName")] public abstract Dictionary<CompoundValue, string> SelectAll2(); } %> <h5>ScalarSourceAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> If a method returns a scalar value, this attribute can be used to specify how database returns this value. The <b>ScalarSource</b> attribute take a parameter of the <b>ScalarSourceType</b> type: </p> <table class='data'> <tr><th>ScalarSourceType</th><th>Description</th></tr> <tr><td>DataReader</td><td>Calls the <b>DbManager.ExecuteReader</b> method, and then calls <b>IDataReader.GetValue</b> method to read the value.</td></tr> <tr><td>OutputParameter</td><td>Calls the <b>DbManager.ExecuteNonQuery</b> method, and then reads value from the <b>IDbDataParameter.Value</b> property.</td></tr> <tr><td>ReturnValue</td><td>Calls the <b>DbManager.ExecuteNonQuery</b> method, and then reads return value from command parameter collection.</td></tr> <tr><td>AffectedRows</td><td>Calls the <b>DbManager.ExecuteNonQuery</b> method, and then returns its return value.</td></tr> </table> <h5>SqlQueryAttribute</h5> <p class='j'> This attribute allows specifying SQL statement. </p> <% cs # public abstract class PersonAccessor : DataAccessor<Person, PersonAccessor> { [SqlQuery("SELECT * FROM Person WHERE PersonID = @id")] public abstract Person GetByID(int @id); } %> <h4>Conclusion</h4> <p class='j'> I hope this brief tutorial demonstrates one of the simplest, quickest and most low-maintenance ways to develop your data access layer. In addition, you will get one more benefit, which is incredible object mapping performance. But that is a topic we will discuss later. </p>